Trump's end to a environmental era wasn't too expensive or costly. I believe we can compromise. We have to be able to conduct experiments & stuff...

 I mean, Obama & his Democrats wanted to eliminate fossil fuels. But, the argument was how this was going to be done. Because it would've been a dictate if it were done. I don't believe electricity is that costly on the environment. Then you must be talking about carbon dioxide, I believe it was. You remove the net-carbon & the carbon-dioxide is greatly reduced. Well, carbon is an element of ore, fire, & smoke. We should be able to have a planet that's greatly capable of being damaged. I couldn't imagine the Earth being destroyed. You think about, though. You do. Well, nothing that mankind has can do that, besides some kind of thermal power. Because the Earth's core generates a planetarian's core worth's a self-same & manner 'mini-nova.'

You go further, Nuclear weapons aren't capable of it, to the planet, itself. That's where we get confused. The planet should be very strong. But yes, our existence on Earth is very fragile. But the planet itself is very sturdy. There should be no reason why we can't experiment within our orbit. There was snow before. I mean, let it warm up. It isn't the end of the World. Remove what the Net-Carbons are, okay, that effected the temperature of the planet by 10-degrees. So, removing net-carbon was a huge advancement. I don't feel it necessary to rush more radical measures to counter-effect global warming.